Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TICAS results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,319 of 28,364 speakers). This TICAS is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
TICAS
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos