Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Stolly results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,313 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Stolly is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Thomas Stolly
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos