Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Erl results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Pessimism Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 48.75 hits. Analysis detected 225.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,495 of 27,529 speakers). This Thomas Erl is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Thomas Erl
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
27.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 49.2%49.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 49.2%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos