Speaker summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos35.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias and Representativeness Heuristic, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,259 of 28,364 speakers). This Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership
Speaker details
Total words: 35.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos35.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos