Speaker summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Legal Aid Society results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 44.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,923 of 28,364 speakers). This The Legal Aid Society is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
The Legal Aid Society
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
44.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.2%41.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos