Speaker summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Appeal results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (23,549 of 37,767 speakers). This The Appeal is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
The Appeal
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠38%The Appeal (selected)23%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 141
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
22.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos141 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.2%23.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos