Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video154.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tess Tinkler results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 154.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,978 of 28,364 speakers). This Tess Tinkler is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Tess Tinkler
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 154.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.1% percentile
20.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos154.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos