Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terri Sewell results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Special Pleading, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 89.7% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,735 of 28,364 speakers). This Terri Sewell is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Terri Sewell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
36.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 89.7%89.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 89.7%89.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 89.7%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 89.7%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos