Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video91.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tennis Canada results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Framing Effect, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 47.25 hits. Analysis detected 131.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,806 of 28,364 speakers). This Tennis Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Tennis Canada
Speaker details
Total words: 91.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
40.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos91.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.4%34.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

CBC | Tennis News⁠11%
CBC⁠49%7/24/2026, 4:48:54 PM