Speaker summary
⁠65%5 analyzed articles/videos312.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Lieu results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 649.753 faulty-reasoning hits from 312.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,523 of 28,364 speakers). This Ted Lieu is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Ted Lieu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.0% percentile
9.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos312.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos