Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TBS results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (9,916 of 28,364 speakers). This TBS is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
TBS
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos