Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video94.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Bennett results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 163 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,477 of 28,364 speakers). This Taylor Bennett is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Taylor Bennett
Speaker details
Total words: 94.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
25.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.4%29.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos