Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taryn Asher results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Taryn Asher is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Taryn Asher
Speaker details
Total words: 484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos484 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos