Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tal Liani results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Middle Ground, and Self-Serving Bias, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,008 of 28,269 speakers). This Tal Liani is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Tal Liani
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
26.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 2.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos