Speaker summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Takaichi results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.9% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,798 of 28,364 speakers). This Takaichi is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Takaichi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
40.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.9%60.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos