Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwanese defense ministry results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,130 of 28,364 speakers). This Taiwanese defense ministry is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Taiwanese defense ministry
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos