Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Morning Herald results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,986 of 28,364 speakers). This Sydney Morning Herald is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Sydney Morning Herald
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
52.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.1%58.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 34.9%34.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos