Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Switzerland results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,872 of 26,155 speakers). This Switzerland is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Switzerland
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos