Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swift results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,117 of 28,364 speakers). This Swift is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Swift
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos