Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Svetlana Stephenson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 79.4% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 283.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,277 of 28,364 speakers). This Svetlana Stephenson is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Svetlana Stephenson
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
26.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos129.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 79.4%79.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.8%42.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 79.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos