Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video43.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Swierc results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Begging the Question, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 70.8% saturation with 29.723 hits. Analysis detected 113.723 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,877 of 28,364 speakers). This Suzanne Swierc is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Suzanne Swierc
Speaker details
Total words: 43.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 70.8%70.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.2%29.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 70.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos