Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video183.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Morrison results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Genetic Fallacy, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 296.964 faulty-reasoning hits from 183.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,542 of 28,364 speakers). This Suzanne Morrison is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Suzanne Morrison
Speaker details
Total words: 183.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos183.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos