Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video17 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supporters of the legislation results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 17 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Supporters of the legislation is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Supporters of the legislation
Speaker details
Total words: 17
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos17 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos