Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sumit Ritolia results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 110.83 hits. Analysis detected 300.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,119 of 27,801 speakers). This Sumit Ritolia is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Sumit Ritolia
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠42%Sumit Ritolia (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 181
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
26.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos181 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos