Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sullenberger results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 49 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,493 of 28,364 speakers). This Sullenberger is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Sullenberger
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 69.0%69.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.0%31.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Bandwagon: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 15.9%BandwagonSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos