Speaker summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suhas Subramanyam results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 71.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 153.558 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,451 of 28,364 speakers). This Suhas Subramanyam is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Suhas Subramanyam
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
41.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 71.6%71.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 49.5%49.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 71.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos