Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sue Ellen Chambers results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 44.955 hits. Analysis detected 255.655 faulty-reasoning hits from 131 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,238 of 28,364 speakers). This Sue Ellen Chambers is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Sue Ellen Chambers
Speaker details
Total words: 131
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
20.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos131 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos