Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Clark results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Primacy Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 80.8% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 303 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,173 of 28,364 speakers). This Stuart Clark is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Stuart Clark
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 208
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
29.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos208 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 80.8%80.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos