Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Woolf results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,888 of 28,364 speakers). This Steven Woolf is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Steven Woolf
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos