Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 70.4% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 230 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,184 of 28,364 speakers). This Steven is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Steven
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
58.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos