Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Schleicher results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 40.125 hits. Analysis detected 137 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,733 of 28,364 speakers). This Steve Schleicher is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Steve Schleicher
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠59%Steve Schleicher (selected)41%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
40.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 31.0%31.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos