Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Parker results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,322 of 28,364 speakers). This Steve Parker is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Steve Parker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos