Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Maviglio results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 62.5% saturation with 37.5 hits. Analysis detected 85.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (11,947 of 26,884 speakers). This Steve Maviglio is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Steve Maviglio
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 62.5%62.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 62.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos