Speaker summary
44% 3 analyzed articles/videos 905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Hobbs results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Slippery Slope , and Confirmation Bias , with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 1,511.58 faulty-reasoning hits from 905 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,340 of 26,850 speakers). This Steve Hobbs is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Steve Hobbs
Speaker details
Total words: 905
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos905 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst