Speaker summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Ehlmann results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 493.745 faulty-reasoning hits from 159 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (23,569 of 26,780 speakers). This Steve Ehlmann is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Steve Ehlmann
Speaker details
Total words: 159
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 10.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos159 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 38.9% 38.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst