Speaker summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos44.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Cohen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 44.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,650 of 26,780 speakers). This Steve Cohen is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Steve Cohen
Speaker details
Total words: 44.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
43.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos44.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.3%77.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.7%18.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos