Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Carmel results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,519 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephen Carmel is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Stephen Carmel
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠56%Stephen Carmel (selected)38%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos