Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Sneed results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Special Pleading, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 193 faulty-reasoning hits from 206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,035 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Sneed is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Stephanie Sneed
Speaker details
Total words: 206
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
15.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos206 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 14.6%14.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos