Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Grisham results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 94 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,606 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Grisham is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Stephanie Grisham
Speaker details
Total words: 94
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
37.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos94 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 37.2%37.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.2%37.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 2.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos