Speaker summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos466.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Ambriz results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 872.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 466.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,409 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephanie Ambriz is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Stephanie Ambriz
Speaker details
Total words: 466.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos466.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.9%15.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.0%9.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos