Speaker summary
87%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stelson’s campaign spokesperson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Self-Serving Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 86% (4,067 of 28,364 speakers). This Stelson’s campaign spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Stelson’s campaign spokesperson
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often