Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stebbings results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,759 of 28,364 speakers). This Stebbings is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Stebbings
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 110
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos110 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.0%30.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.2%28.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos