Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stavroula Vourou results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 65.2% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,522 of 28,364 speakers). This Stavroula Vourou is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Stavroula Vourou
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
25.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 65.2%65.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 34.8%34.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.1%23.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 65.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos