Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stavros Anthony results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,937.773 faulty-reasoning hits from 891 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,612 of 28,364 speakers). This Stavros Anthony is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Stavros Anthony
Speaker details
Total words: 891
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.7% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos891 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos