Speaker summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos91.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These state police results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.667 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,702 of 28,364 speakers). This state police is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
state police
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 91.667
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
30.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos91.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos