Speaker summary
⁠60%4 analyzed articles/videos78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Star Tribune results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 307 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,162 of 28,364 speakers). This Star Tribune is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Star Tribune
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
24.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos