Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stan Shaw results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 733.285 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Stan Shaw is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Stan Shaw
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 243
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
14.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos243 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 56.2%56.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Red Herring: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Special Pleading: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos