Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video114.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacey Wisnia results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 66.6% saturation with 85.875 hits. Analysis detected 278.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (15,822 of 26,862 speakers). This Stacey Wisnia is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Stacey Wisnia
Speaker details
Total words: 114.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
25.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos114.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 66.6%66.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 66.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 2.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos