Speaker summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 249.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spike Lee results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 98 hits . Analysis detected 488.285 faulty-reasoning hits from 249.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 5% (26,991 of 28,364 speakers). This Spike Lee is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Spike Lee
Speaker details
Total words: 249.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos249.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 19.0% 19.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Anecdotal: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst