Speaker summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southern Environmental Law Center results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Genetic Fallacy, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,138 of 28,364 speakers). This Southern Environmental Law Center is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Southern Environmental Law Center
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
29.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos